Is Kony 2012 a Game-Changer?

I am sure that many of you will have seen the Kony 2012 campaign on the internet over the last week or so. For the very few that haven’t click HERE and watch the video.
In a recent post I talked about H.G. Wells and what things might be like in the future. Now having seen Kony 2012, I wonder if things like this may shape our futures. The ‘Invisible Children’ campaign certainly presents itself as changing history.
There has been a lot of debate and controversy surrounding this campaign, it is beautifully presented but perhaps simplistic. It’s goal is to capture the Ugandan warlord, Joseph Kony. Undoubtedly Kony is a man who appears to have committed horrific crimes, specifically against children and I applaud the campaign motives in shining a global light upon him. I hope the campaign succeeds and he is brought to justice. For me justice would be a trial, not his death.
Of course there are many complex problems in the world and bringing Kony to justice would be just one small victory. It would not solve the many problems that exist in central Africa. But I believe it would be a start.
There are many critics out there, quick to judge the makers of this campaign over their motives and finances and some of their criticisms may have foundation. However I am hoping a campaign like this may set a precedent. If they succeed and Kony is captured this year then this could be the forefront of change in global politics and shows how the power of the Internet and social media could shape our future.
Last year we saw the Arab spring revolutions in Northern Africa and we saw riots on the streets of England. Both of these sets of events were orchestrated via social media like BBM, Facebook and Twitter.
Such ‘people power’, whether for good or ill, will begin to have an effect on politicians and the powerful. Politicians in all nations will no longer be able to ignore the connections people around the world are making. Global concerns of ordinary people may well begin to affect national agendas.
Perhaps I am being too naive and hopeful. But it might just be that we are seeing the slow beginnings of a new way of orchestrating our world. One where injustice cannot just be ignored wherever it lies.
I hope so. Please research the Kony 2012 campaign and let me know what you think. Perhaps we are beginning to live in a world where all our voices can be heard…

© 2012 Simon Poore

20120311-121639.jpg
Joseph Kony

20120311-122155.jpg

Advertisements

Why the Government makes me unhappy…

So, it’s finally time I talked about politics on here. Apologies to those who don’t think a blog is the place for politics, or those who I offend with my views. I will declare that I am LEFT of centre with SOCIALIST tendencies. There I said it. I wonder how many of you are now put off?
Two things have made me think about this. Firstly I discovered a blog where it revealed to me where Governments borrow their money from. There is a lot of talk about the national debt of several countries (including the UK) and all of the ‘austerity’ measures that are ‘necessary’ to pay back this debt. No one ever seems to mention who we owe it to?
This week it was announced that UK government debt reached a TRILLION pounds. That’s £16,000 for each person in the population. This is affecting me personally. As a public servant I am subject to a pay freeze. No pay rise for me for a while. And my pension will cost more while I have to work longer to get it. I should say that compared to most, I am still doing ok, at least I have a fairly secure job (for now).
There are cuts in public services everywhere, including caps coming in welfare. Unemployment is rising sharply, particularly for young people. In contrast in the private sector, top executive pay increased by 12% in 2011.
I don’t want to seem like I am just moaning, but everyday something in the news depresses me, actually makes me feel unhappy and even angry. All of this seems to be happening because of the ‘National Debt’. So who exactly do we owe all this money to?
Well the Government issues ‘bonds’, known as ‘gilts’, and anyone can buy them and cash them in at a later date. So who buys these? It seems that the biggest investors are banks, insurance companies and pension funds. In the UK this means that the Government borrowed money from these institutions. Now here’s the fun bit. Some banks were in trouble, so the Government bailed them out with money they borrowed from the banks. Yes you did read that right. For example, the Royal Bank of Scotland buys gilts from the Government, the Government paid millions into the RBS to stop it going bust.
Is it just me or does that sound bonkers? And who is paying for all that? Seems like we are, all us ordinary folks.
The other thing I thought about was the language that is used to describe all of that mess. Firstly ‘SOCIALISM’ has become a dirty word, especially in the USA, but increasingly here too. For example Republican candidates regularly accuse President Obama of being a ‘Socialist’. I would argue there isn’t really any Socialism to be seen in the USA.
Socialism has varying degrees to it, it is not simply some failed or flawed political system from a bygone age. For example, in the UK we have the National Health Service. We all pay for it via national insurance and we all benefit from its services. We all own it, it serves us all. That is socialism. The NHS is a Socialist institution. Socialism is where the state (the taxpayer) owns institutions that work and provide services for all the citizens. What’s so wrong with that?
If we were more ‘Socialist’ we could nationalise banks like the RBS and make them work for EVERYONE, not just the rich few. The cuts and ‘austerity’ are talked about as if they are ‘inevitable’, as if we have no choice. Anyone who objects or complains is described as extreme, like Micheal Gove (UK Education Secretary) calling teachers like myself ‘Trots’ (Trotsky), as if we are somehow ‘loony left’ revolutionaries.
To cap it all we now live in a world where ‘financial analysts’ from New York (Standard and Poors) decide the credit rating of whole countries (they recently downgraded the credit rating of France for example). This affects whether banks will lend to countries or not. Which in turn affects ordinary citizens jobs and lives. My question is this; who elected them? What happened to democracy? Unelected banks, big business and financial institutions are more powerful than the ballot box. Something is wrong.
So, enough ranting, guess I just had to share it. I will freely admit that I am no financial expert, and have no doubt that some will criticise me for my simplistic analysis. BUT if there is any truth to what I say here and if you believe that Governments are there to SERVE all that elect them then it seems hard not to agree something is wrong.
Whether you agree with what I say or not, please simply think about this – the language politicians and the media use to describe things define what those things are. And they define them according to to certain agenda. What they say may not be true. What they say will NOT give a full picture of what is happening. Dig deeper, read wider, make up your own mind. Please…
As ever your comments are welcome…
If you are interested in these issues please visit SturdyBlog written by @sturdyAlex he explains in a most eloquent and witty way and I thank him for the inspiration for my thoughts…

20120125-214142.jpg

© 2011 Simon Poore